T&T Compliance Shield AI Hiring Review
Illinois AI employment compliance

AI hiring compliance, organized into one clear file.

For the initial launch window, qualified employers, attorneys, and HR advisors can request a free guided pilot. AegisReview turns hiring-tool context into one organized file: tool inventory, evidence gaps, notice-readiness notes, and next steps for HR or legal counsel.

5-7 DaysGuided review file
HB 3773Illinois AI hiring focus
Audit TrailDesigned for review
Review ControlNo blind sends
Launch offer

Request a free guided pilot.

For the first launch group, AegisReview can open a guided review path for one scoped employer file after fit, scope, and data boundaries are confirmed. The goal is simple: identify the hiring-tool facts, organize the evidence questions, and show whether a paid Snapshot or counsel review is worth the next step.

Free

Exposure check

Public hiring signals create a short first-pass brief. No workspace or document intake.

Guided

Review request

Qualified launch users can request a scoped path so fit and data boundaries are clear.

Private

Workspace access

Customer records sit behind named workspace access and approved membership.

Scoped

Evidence intake

Restricted documents require signed scope, DPA terms, private storage, and 30-day retention.

Why this matters now

HB 3773 changes the AI hiring conversation in Illinois.

Public Act 103-0804, commonly tracked as HB 3773, amends the Illinois Human Rights Act effective January 1, 2026. Employers using artificial intelligence or automated decision systems in hiring or employment need transparency notices and must avoid AI use that causes discrimination against protected classes.

1

Notice

Employers using AI in covered hiring or employment decisions need a clear notice process for affected applicants or employees.

2

Discrimination risk

AI tools cannot be used in a way that subjects employees or applicants to unlawful discrimination, including proxy concerns such as ZIP-code use.

3

Rulemaking is active

IDHR temporarily postponed proposed notice rules on June 2, 2026, but the statutory effective date remains January 1, 2026.

4

Business exposure

The practical risk is showing up unprepared: unknown tools, missing vendor evidence, unclear notices, and no clean file for HR or counsel review.

Built for clean review files

A practical intake layer before attorney review.

AegisReview organizes the facts employers and legal counsel need first: tool inventory, vendor evidence gaps, notice-readiness notes, assumptions, and open questions. The result is a cleaner file for HR, leadership, and attorney review.

1

Inventory

Capture the ATS, sourcing, assessment, video interview, HRIS, chatbot, and general AI tools involved in hiring.

2

Evidence

Track what vendor documentation exists, what is missing, and who is assigned to the request.

3

Readiness

Separate confirmed facts from open exposure, unknown settings, and notice-review gaps.

4

Review

Package a clean handoff for HR or legal counsel before final notices or policy commitments are used.

Before and after

From scattered vendor notes to one review file.

Instead of sending counsel screenshots, vendor emails, ATS notes, and uncertain tool lists, AegisReview packages the first-pass facts into a file that can be reviewed, corrected, assigned, and approved.

AegisReview

AegisReview turns scattered AI hiring questions into an organized compliance file.

The review package combines intake, tool inventory, HB 3773 exposure review, action reporting, template scaffolding, approval gates, and record history so employers can make decisions from one place.

Why we built this

Built for the messy middle before counsel review.

The problem is rarely one missing notice. It is the scattered work before anyone can make a responsible decision: tool names, vendor proof, assumptions, gaps, and who needs to approve what.

Founder note

AegisReview was built to make AI hiring compliance easier to review, not easier to hand-wave. The first job is practical: find the hiring tools, organize the evidence, separate known facts from open questions, and prepare the file for HR, compliance, or counsel. The product stays focused on documentation, review control, and clear handoff instead of pretending software can replace legal judgment.

Proof without testimonials

Until customer quotes are available, the public proof stack stays factual: a sample compliance file, guided walkthrough, Trust & Data page, terms and privacy pages, and the attorney review packet. Buyers can inspect the workflow before relying on anyone else's endorsement.

Operating principle

Every page points back to the same file: exposure, inventory, evidence, notice readiness, review status, and next action. Features that do not improve that record stay out of the first customer flow.